An analogy most readers can probably relate to concerns the riding of a bicycle. It is impossible to depict the forces that keep a bicycle upright, in a single or a set of static equations; since these would always be critically incomplete and showing the bicycle to be falling (i.e. to be in a state of disequilibrium) instead of staying upright. A mechanical engineer showing off his expertise by using such static equations would be considered a charlatan of the worst kind. Yet economists have been making decisions, affecting the lifes and conditions of billions of people, based on equations that are even less prone to reflect reality; for, while mechanical forces are at least deterministic, i.e. with fixed coefficients, economic forces are indeterminate as deduced axiomatically. The assignment of rights based on the unverifiable opinion, that sets of economic equations are yet conclusive (i.e. depicting a state of equilibrium, because it is so much easier to work with) is idiocy on par with legislating the value of pi to be exactly 3 from now on.