Links to the best stuff
Community Toolbox ~ a vast resource
Ashoka ~ social entrepreneurs
Green Media Toolshed ~ great media training
The Control Game ~ spot fake involvement
Shelterforce ~ community dev articles
ZNet ~ articles on social change
National Civic League ~ citizen involvement
Civic Practices Network ~ lots of material
Community Development Discussion Listserve
Citizen Toolbox ~ 60 tools from Australia
Benton Foundation ~ media action
Rural Community Toolbox
Links for Building Democracy & Community
Creating Web Action Alerts
Training for Change
Minneapolis, Minnesota

Structure

Minneapolis has a formally recognized system of neighbourhood participation in the Neighborhood Revitalization Program (NRP). The focus of this initiative is on developing medium and long-term plans for neighbourhoods. The program is described as a "joint powers agreement under the [city] charter including the School Board, the County, the City, the Library Board, and the Parks Board". Each of the above parties is represented on a Policy Board. The Policy Board also includes representatives from the Urban League, the United Way, the Chamber of Commerce. Minneapolis neighbourhoods elect a total of 4 members to the Board. The Policy Board has a committee structure and also initiates short term task forces on an as-needed basis.

There are 81 neighbourhood associations across Minneapolis but not all areas have a neighbourhood association. Neighbourhood associations who contract with the city for services must be legally incorporated.

Neighbourhood boundaries are determined by the planning department on natural boundaries, highways, or school catchment areas. There is no minimum or maximum population base required for neighbourhood designation.

City council members are elected on a district (ward) basis.

Because the emphasis of the NRP is on long range planning, a need was identified for a more responsive program to address immediate needs of the neighbourhoods. The program, Community and Resource Exchange (CARE), works with neighbourhoods (who request assistance) on an ad hoc basis. There are no criteria for membership -"who comes is who comes". The exchange consists of matching resources; people, materials and occasionally money; with neighbourhoods who identify a project of immediate need. There is no structure to the program.

Scope of Activities

The NRP focuses on the development of medium and long range plans for Minneapolis' neighbourhoods. There is no participation in day-to-day decision making or service delivery, Neighbourhood input is limited to development of neighbourhood plans.

The CARE program has initiated 5 projects in neighbourhoods which serve as models for other neighbourhoods. These are:

Citizen Inspection Program.
This program was initiated in a poor inner city neighbourhood with a problem of abandoned and poorly maintained residential buildings. The neighbourhood trained under city inspectors to learn to identify 7 common areas of violation of building and health regulations. To date 80 volunteer inspectors have been trained. The volunteer inspectors are empowered to writing letters to building owners outlining violations and measures required to comply. The compliance record for the volunteer inspectors is 80% compared to 60% for city inspectors.

Tree Planting Program for Private Property.
This program matches low income, physically challenged citizens who wish to plant trees on their property with a nursery willing to provide trees at a reduced cost, non-profit organizations willing to deliver trees, and youths who plant the trees. Citizens who wish to participate must attend classes on selection and care of trees.

Rental Property Owners Group.
This group formed in one neighbourhood where most property owners lived outside of the area. The neighbourhood was in decline and property values were dropping. At present, 60% of the area's property owners are meeting monthly to share information and training opportunities. The program recently expanded into 3 additional neighbourhoods.

Housing Connections Program.
This project was initiated in an inner-city neighbourhood characterized by a high vacancy rate. The city's Housing Placement Agency had a list of tenants who wished to live in the area but who were unable to find an affordable apartment. Owners were contacted and a pilot project involving 21 units was started. Owners and tenants are provided with some initial orientation. To date, 7 out of every 8 tenants are still in place, showing a significant reduction in turnover. Based on that success, the program has been expanded to 100 buildings providing 1000 units. In order to participate every owner must agree to an inspection and to charge an "affordable" rent.

Concentrated Weeding Program.
This program focuses on neighbourhoods with multiple problems related to crime, drugs, and violent activity. When an area is identified, all enforcement agencies (16 in total) from the city, county, state and federal governments co-ordinate a one-night enforcement raid in the area. Across the board compliance is enforced. The initiative requires full co-operation and strategic planning.
A similar program for environmental regulation compliance is planned.


Resources

The NRP has a budget of $20 million per year for 20 years for 81 neighbourhoods. Representatives from the agencies listed in Structure (above) are included in the program. Planning staff are also assigned to the program.

The CARE program has virtually no fixed resources: neighbourhoods with needs are matched by the Director of the Neighborhood Revitalization Program with resource people on an ad hoc basis.

History and Comments

Both programs outlined above were initiated by city politicians. The NRP was characterized by the survey respondent as "a top down process" with planners, department heads and administrators identifying goals. lt has appealed mostly to neighbourhoods with a higher socio-economic status.

The CARE program only works with a neighbourhood at their request and attempts to "empower' neighbourhoods by tackling smaller, do-able projects first and then moving on to bigger issues.

Obstacles to implementation of both programs were identified: absence of trust on part of the citizens; pressures that citizens face which impede their ability to participate (eg. demands of work and family life); the amount of time required to participate; people's fear of change, and; a rigid organizational structure with no incentive to change. The CARE program was initiated partly in order to address these obstacles.




New Ways of Governing
The Citizen's Handbook / Charles Dobson / www.vcn.bc.ca/citizens-handbook